{"active":true,"first_name":"Simon","last_name":"Ng","race":"Asian","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"TB","assignment_date":"2025-11-03","id":"TB"},"shield_no":3498,"taxid":"955260","command_history":[{"command":"TB DT30","id":"TB30"},{"command":"067 PCT","id":"67pct"}],"middle_initial":"Y","shield_no_history":[14354],"appt_date":"2013-07-09","lawsuits":[{"name":"Small, Antonio, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2023-05-24","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"515280/2023","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On, or about May 24, 2020, Plaintiff Antonio Small was standing outside of a friend’s  apartment building near 250 Clarkson Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, hanging out with several other young men, when an unmarked sedan pulled up and several officers exited the vehicle. Some of the young men were smoking marijuana when the police approached the group. Plaintiff was not smoking, but had a small amount of marijuana in his bag, which was searched by the Individual Defendants John Does Nos. 1–10 whose identities are unknown and served as the basis for his arrest. Possession of small quantities of marijuana has not been a crime in most instances in New York since 1977, and was further decriminalized starting on August 28, 2019, nine months before this unlawful stop and frisk occurred.\n\nThe NYPD, however, failed to change its practices to conform to the law, and \ncontinued using possession of small amounts of marijuana as a pretext to arrest and detain young men of color and interrogate them about unrelated incidents, or unlawfully hold them in a precinct while NYPD officers attempt to obtain evidence of an actual crime. Despite the fact that Antonio did not commit a crime,\nthe Individual Defendants cuffed and detained him and took him to 67th Precinct to interrogate him for a completely unrelated matter, in lieu of obtaining a warrant based on probable cause to arrest Antonio for the crime they were actually investigating. \n\nThe single charge was not prosecuted by the Kings County District Attorney’s Office, because the charge was a nullity under the law. The Individual Defendants continued to pursue Antonio after his release, and used false statements to obtain a search warrant, which was executed at Plaintiffs’ family home a few days after Antonio’s arrest. Even if the warrant was obtained lawfully, the Individual Defendants nevertheless exceeded its scope when they kicked down the front door of Plaintiffs family residence and searched every room (including the bedrooms of minor children, and separate apartment units belonging to different family members). The search was further unreasonable because the Individual Defendants destroyed property and ransacked the home unnecessarily, causing damage to property and inflicting  unnecessary emotional pain on Plaintiffs. No evidence of any crime was obtained during this unlawful search","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=kYRx6UbG0E32LmzD_PLUS_RSwdw==","type":"complaint"}]}],"payroll":{"salary":"118056","regular":"111730","overtime":"29362","other":"20355","total":"161447"},"id":"3X4Z","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/3X4Z"}