{"active":false,"first_name":"Christophe","last_name":"Borbee","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"101 PCT","id":"101pct"},"shield_no":367,"ended_date":"2010-04-20","taxid":"888121","complaint_ids":[200002610,9302487,9200506],"appt_date":"1986-01-09","lawsuits":[{"name":"Breland, Chad vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2022-08-30","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"22CV02207","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","summary":"On November 27, 1995, plaintiff was unlawfully arrested by PO Mannone and Sgt. Borbee based upon their false evidence that he was the man they stopped and frisked two hours prior in the immediate vicinity of a robbery. Det. Cashen claimed plaintiff was identified by a confidential informant, even though the complainant was unable to identify him as one of the robbers. During that time, additional evidence was gathered regarding an additional robbery, which took place on November 13, 1995. During a line-up, plaintiff was not identified, but was still charged and tried for burglary, robbery, weapon possession and possession of stolen property, which stemmed from the robbery on November 27, 1995. Sgt. Borbee and PO Mannone falsely claimed that plaintiff was the same man they had questioned on the street shortly before the report of the November 13, 1995, robbery. The CIU of the Queens County DA’s Office concluded that the indictment relating to the incident on November 27, 1995 should be dismissed because the confidential informant relied upon was one of the individuals that burglarized and participated in the November 13, 1995 robbery, alongside PO Mannone’s and Sgt. Borbee’s faulty identification. The CIU also found that the NYPD failed to disclose prints that eliminated plaintiff as a suspect and identified the informant as the culprit of the crimes that plaintiff was charged with, and such information was withheld from the defense in 1995 by the DA’s office. After spending over twenty years in prison, the DA’s office joined plaintiff’s motion to vacate the conviction on October 15, 2021. Plaintiff now seeks monetary damages against the City of New York, due to the deliberate indifference of policymakers at the New York City Police Department and the Queens County District Attorney.","documents":[{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.478892/gov.uscourts.nyed.478892.1.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63244950/breland-v-the-city-of-new-york/"}],"id":"5R32","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/5R32"}