{"active":false,"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Burbridge","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"DT1","command":{"command":"JT T/F","assignment_date":"2017-03-11","id":"112"},"shield_no":3716,"ended_date":"2025-01-02","taxid":"936261","complaint_ids":[200901627,200813744,200812089,200805502,200804612,200716970,200702198],"command_history":[{"command":"090 PCT","id":"90pct"},{"command":"PBBN AC"}],"appt_date":"2005-01-10","age":43,"shield_no_history":[15488],"lawsuits":[{"officer_name":"Burbridge, Michael","disposition":"Settlement","start_date":"2010-03-09","disposition_date":"2017-04-17","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","docket":"032291/2009","name":"Lopez, George Jayson vs City of New York, et al.","payout_amount":15000},{"name":"Marshall v. The City of New York et al","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","payout_amount":190000,"disposition":"Order/Judgment (Verdict)","summary":"Joshua Marshall was leaving a nearby drug store when he was suddenly accosted by several members of the NYPD, with their guns drawn. The defendants immediately searched Joshua, which did not uncover any contraband or evidence of illegal activity. Notwithstanding the lack of any evidence, defendants arrested Joshua and charged him with criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and fourth degree. Neither of which were true. In addition, Joshua was subjected to an invasive strip search while in police custody. In connection with this arrest, defendants filled out false and misleading police reports and forwarded these reports to prosecutors in the DA's Office. Afterwards, defendants repeatedly gave false and misleading testimony regarding the facts and circumstances of plaintiff's arrest. As a result of his unlawful arrest, Joshua spent about 135 days in jail and made numerous court appearances in connection with the false charges against him. On May 27, 2009 all charges were dismissed.","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4922902-Marshall-v-The-City-of-New-York-et-al"},{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4922903-Marshall-v-The-City-of-New-York-et-al"}],"docket":"10CV02714","officer_name":"Michael P. Burbridge"},{"name":"Pabon et al v. City of New York et al","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","payout_amount":195000,"disposition":"Settlement","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4922911-Pabon-et-al-v-City-of-New-York-et-al"},{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4922912-Pabon-et-al-v-City-of-New-York-et-al"}],"docket":"11CV00706","officer_name":"Michael P. Burbridge"},{"name":"Sanchez v. City of New York et al","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","payout_amount":20000,"disposition":"Settlement","summary":"On or about November 29, 2006 at approximately 11:00pm in the County of Kings, Nancy Sanchez was offered a ride home by a Mr. Pedro Rosario-Vasquez; a patron of the establishment at which Ms. Sanchez had just finished working. Upon Nancy entering Mr. Vasquez's vehicle, Nancy, Mr. Vasquez, and a third-party were promptly detained and subsequently arrested by defendants Burbridge and Does. Said parties were charged with inter alia Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree. Burbridge and Does had no reason to believe that plaintiff had any knowledge of the contraband allegedly recovered from Mr. Vasquez's vehicle. Upon information and belief, Burbridge and Does arrested Nancy in bad faith and solely to inflate their arrest numbers. On December 5, 2006 a Kings County Grand Jury found that no probable cause existed that plaintiff Nancy Sanchez committed any offence. The grand jury returned a verdict of no true bill and the case was dismissed. Despite the no true bill and dismissal of the criminal case on December 5, 2006, Nancy was not released from custody as required by law. Instead, Nancy was returned to Rikers Island where she was unlawfully incarcerated for an additional three days before being released on December 8, 2006. The commissioner and the DA have an actual and/or de facto policy and practice of failing to ensure the immediate release from custody of incarcerated defendants upon dismissal of their cases by the grand jury.","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4922901-Sanchez-v-City-of-New-York-et-al"}],"docket":"07CV01777","officer_name":"Michael P. Burbridge"}],"id":"6YUH","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/6YUH"}