{"active":true,"first_name":"Jerelme","last_name":"Herasme","race":"Hispanic","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"WARRSEC","assignment_date":"2025-04-28","id":"118"},"shield_no":4203,"taxid":"961812","complaint_ids":[202504589,202411323,202409164,201804969],"command_history":[{"command":"025 PCT","id":"25pct"},{"command":"043 PCT","id":"43pct"}],"appt_date":"2016-07-13","middle_initial":"V","shield_no_history":[710,171],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Hayes, Roland vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2019-04-17","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"153750/2019","court":"Supreme Court - New York","officer_name":"Herasme, Jerelme","summary":"On or about January 18, 2018, Roland Hayes (\"Plaintiff\") found a phone in/nr a restaurant and was unlawfully arrested then imprisoned by Police Officer Jerelme Herasme, Sergeant David Kaeron, Police Officers John and Jane Doe 1-5 (\"Defendant Officers\"). The Defendant Officers claimed this was due to the Plaintiff's record for committing a sex offence. The Owner of the phone had stated he did not want charges pressed but false criminal process were initiated for petit larceny. \n\nThe CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY, DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION and Defendant Officers knew or should have known, through the exercise of proper procedure and reasonable investigation, that the subject arrest, imprisonment, and prosecution were not in good faith and were without probable cause.","documents":[{"url":"https://web.archive.org/save/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=LvEKqQhsNoiof24hJZIYqA==","type":"complaint"}]}],"payroll":{"salary":"118056","regular":"117719","overtime":"31181","other":"19249","total":"168149"},"id":"8P3T","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/8P3T"}