{"active":true,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Desimone","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"DT3","command":{"command":"DBBN OP","assignment_date":"2021-06-14","id":"410"},"shield_no":1221,"taxid":"946922","complaint_ids":[201604848,201013079],"command_history":[{"command":"NARCBBN","id":"92"},{"command":"BN IRT"},{"command":"SRG 1","id":"SRG1"}],"appt_date":"2008-07-08","middle_initial":"L","shield_no_history":[11704],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Baptiste, Marlene, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2021-11-08","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"528449/2021","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On November 20, 2019, inside  1322 Sterling Place, Apt. IL, Plaintiffs Megan and Marlene were inside the apartment while Plaintiff Hoyle was elsewhere.  Defendants unlawfully entered said location and illegally searched the apartment by rushing the door, without consent or a warrant. Defendants then detained unlawfully and questioned Plaintiffs Marlene and Megan as to the whereabouts of Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle. Defendants then physically restrained both Plaintiffs with metal handcuffs forcefully in an excessively tight fashion. Defendants did not have probable cause or reasonable suspicion to detain either Plaintiff. Defendants, then subjected Plaintiff Megan to illegal interrogation tactics unless she did not comply with the Defendants and call Plaintiff Hoyle. As a result of her illegal detainment by Defendants, Plaintiff Marlene was caused to have a panic attack and was rushed to the hospital. Plaintiffs Marlene and Megan were detained for over 3 hours. \n\nPlaintiff Hoyle returned to the apartment approximately 3 hours after the defendants entered the apartment. Defendants then physically restrained Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle by handcuffing him in an excessively tight fashion. Defendants did not observe Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle commit a crime or observe him in possession of any contraband. Defendants lacked any probable cause or reasonable suspicion to arrest Plaintiff  Hoyle. Defendants then fabricated the observations to justify their illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle, including the possession of a skimmer device and controlled substance that they falsely purported to have observed in plain view. Defendants then removed Plaintiff Hoyle to the 77th precinct by forcing him into a police vehicle. Defendants then proceeded to criminally process Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle, which included fingerprinting, retina scans, and various invasive bodily searches. Defendants then sent the fabricated evidence to Prosecutors. Defendants proceeded to suppress exculpatory evidence from prosecutors. After Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle's arraignment, he was compelled to return to court multiple times to contest egregiously false criminal charges alleged against him. Plaintiff Hoyle was released after 2 days of detention. The charges against him were dropped on January 7, 2020.","documents":[{"url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20240718190535/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=YfDMQBf92eDF1YBK8ovNXA==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Chapman, Marvey vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2021-02-09","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"502957/2021","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On February 24, 2018, Plaintiff was at a friend's apartment when POs Morales, Desimone, Roach, Freeland, Wright, Cordero, Thevenin, Santana, and Grant, along with four unknown POs, executed a no-knock search warrant for another individual (the \"target\") and entered the apartment. The POs pointed their weapons at Plaintiff and the other occupants, then searched and arrested Plaintiff without probable cause or legal justification. The POs alleged that during their raid they recovered illegal drugs from the target, but they did not recover any illegal drugs, weapons, or contraband from the Plaintiff.\n\nThe POs  intentionally and falsely alleged that Plaintiff possessed the drugs recovered from the target. The POs provided the District Attorney with false information, causing Plaintiff to be criminally prosecuted without probable cause--they told the District Attorney that Plaintiff was closer to the contraband when the apartment was raided. The charge against Plaintiff was ultimately dismissed and sealed in its entirety on December 4, 2018.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=kyP0_PLUS_P6OyXY16I0kKfI5Pg==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Mason v. The City of New York et al","court":"U.S. District Court - Southern District NY","payout_amount":22500,"disposition":"Settlement","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4919166-Mason-v-The-City-of-New-York-et-al"},{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4919167-Mason-v-The-City-of-New-York-et-al"}],"docket":"10CV09697","officer_name":"David L. Desimone"}],"payroll":{"salary":"119980","regular":"115753","overtime":"37006","other":"28865","total":"181624"},"id":"92AK","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/92AK"}