{"active":false,"first_name":"Stephen","last_name":"Ohagan","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT SA","command":{"command":"PSA 6","id":"PSA6"},"shield_no":4511,"ended_date":"2014-07-03","taxid":"887492","complaint_ids":[200815200,200807672,200612602,200611714,200506489,200505644,200308500,9702325,9604639,8803733],"command_history":[{"command":"H SP OP","id":"590"}],"appt_date":"1985-07-08","lawsuits":[{"name":"Butler, Jeffrey vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2016-01-22","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"150829/2016","court":"Supreme Court - New York","officer_name":"O'Hagan, Stephen","summary":"On March 31, 2011, Sergeant Steven O’Hagan, Officer Omisore, and Officer John Doe stopped the vehicle in which the plaintiff was a passenger, citing an alleged traffic violation. During the stop, Sergeant O’Hagan reached through the vehicle window and tapped the plaintiff's pocket. He then instructed the plaintiff to exit the vehicle and conducted a frisk and search, during which he discovered pills in the plaintiff's pocket. The plaintiff was subsequently handcuffed, arrested, and charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell. The vehicle's driver was released at the scene.\nThe plaintiff later entered a guilty plea and remained incarcerated until 2015, when the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department, ruled that \"the physical intrusion of tapping defendant's pocket was unauthorized. The circumstances did not give rise to the reasonable suspicion required to authorize a frisk. Nor was the officer's conduct justifiable as a 'minimal self-protective measure.'\" The court further held that \"because the ensuing frisk outside the car, and the resulting arrest, depended on the initial improper intrusion, they were invalid as well.\"","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=MMO4TP7FBv86HUHym3J8VQ==","type":"complaint"}]}],"id":"AZW6","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/AZW6"}