{"active":false,"first_name":"Gregory","last_name":"Lobianco","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"POM","command":{"command":"109 PCT","id":"109pct"},"shield_no":31307,"ended_date":"2016-11-03","taxid":"955073","lawsuits":[{"name":"Lovell, Latroya vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2017-11-06","disposition_date":"2024-11-19","payout_amount":200000,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"158634/2017","court":"Supreme Court - New York","officer_name":"Lobianco, Gregory","summary":"On December 23, 2015, the plaintiff, Latroya Lovell, and her 1-year old son were robbed by two masked men at gunpoint when they were about to enter the door of her then-boyfriend's apartment in New York, and ransacked the apartment. The robbers stole the plaintiff's phone and wallet. After the robbers left, the plaintiff borrowed a neighbor's phone to call 911, after which the defendants arrived and met the plaintiff in the hallway outside the apartment. The plaintiff informed the defendants that she had been robbed. When the defendants asked for consent to enter and search the apartment, the plaintiff informed that she didn't consent because she could not consent since she did not live or own the apartment. The defendants told her that it was 'suspicious' that she would not let them enter the apartment, and then entered and searched the apartment without consent or warrant. The defendants then detained the plaintiff and told her that she needed to come with them to canvass the neighborhood to see if she could identify the robbers. The plaintiff and her son were placed in the back of an NYPD vehicle and driven directly to the 32nd Precinct. \nAt the 32nd Precinct, the defendants placed the plaintiff and her son in an interrogation room and questioned her for two hours, during which the defendants attempted to pressure her to implicate her then boyfriend in various crimes, but the plaintiff informed the defendants that she was unaware that the boyfriend engaged in any criminal activities. The defendants then informed the plaintiff that she was under arrest for criminal possession of a weapon and reckless endangerment of a child, even though that the defendants did not discover any drugs, weapons from her custody. Prior to the arrest, the defendants informed the plaintiff that they would release her without charge if she would provide them with information about the boyfriend's alleged criminal activities. The plaintiff was placed into a cell at the precinct and the defendants provided their account of the interactions with the plaintiff to support probable cause to enter and search the apartment without consent or warrant and for her arrest. The plaintiff was detained for approximately 17 hours and then transported to a hospital against her will, then to central booking for several hours before arraigned in criminal court before getting bail. The plaintiff was unable to make bail and sent to Riker's Island for approximately 24 hours before being released. The charges against the plaintiff were all dismissed in their entirety on June 30, 2016. The plaintiff were forced to postpone her final semester of undergraduate study and also had to defer her start date for master's degree program as a result.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=QOeJI71x6GFBPNmoD26rQg==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Snead, Lisa vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2016-12-14","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"16CV09528","court":"U.S. District Court - Southern District NY","officer_name":"Lobianco, Gregory","summary":"Plaintiff was approached while walking on the street with her friend when she was stopped and seized. Defendant Officers were rude and hostile to Plaintiff from the outset and refused to tell Plaintiff why she was stopped. Plaintiff was handcuffed and taken to a local precinct, where she was handcuffed to a pole for approximately seven hours. When Plaintiff asked to use a bathroom, her requests were denied. Plaintiff was transported to Central Booking where she remained in a roach infested cell, wearing urine-soaked clothes. Plaintiff was charged with false unspecified charges that were eventually dismissed.","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4923594-Snead-v-Lobianco-et-al","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4551707/snead-v-lobianco/"}],"id":"DBVZ","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/DBVZ"}