{"active":true,"first_name":"Julio","last_name":"Acuria","race":"Hispanic","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"083 PCT","assignment_date":"2026-03-02","id":"83pct"},"shield_no":1077,"taxid":"933593","complaint_ids":[202501710,202308471,202205019,201903610,201803093,201610558],"command_history":[{"command":"084 PCT","id":"84pct"}],"appt_date":"2004-01-20","age":45,"middle_initial":"A","shield_no_history":[15655,1076],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Barrett, David & Douglas, Maegan vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2024-12-19","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"529090/2024","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On or about July 31, 2023 Plaintiffs Barrett and Douglas were in a car with their minor children, with Plaintiff Barret in the driver's seat. As they were traveling POs Vahid Hodzic, Conor McGouran, Julio Acuria, Justin Suarez, Franddy Duran, Karl Virn Williams, Alyssa Strong, Tiagom Reis, and John and Jane Does 1-12 suddenly used their police car to block and surround Plaintiff's car. POs ordered documentation and, when provided, ordered Plaintiff Barrett out of the vehicle. Plaintiff Barrett asked why and POs purposefully shattered the driver's side window and dragged him out of the vehicle. They also pulled one of the children out of the passenger cheat. Plaintiff Barrett was thrown to the ground multiple times and tased both in and out of his car. Plaintiff Barrett did not resist and was not told what he was being arrested for. \n\nPlaintiff Barrett was wrongfully taken to the 83rd Precinct where he was subjected to an invasive bodily search while Plaintiff Douglas was released and compelled to take the children home without Plaintiff Barrett or a vehicle. POs intentionally provided false information to initiate a malicious prosecution against Plaintiff Barrett. Plaintiff Barrett was unlawfully detained for several hours before being released, and all charges were ultimately dismissed. Plaintiff Barrett experienced fear, physical injuries including to his wrists due to excessively-tight handcuffs, and emotional injuries, and both Plaintiffs suffered emotional trauma, fear, embarrassment, humiliation, emotional distress, frustration, extreme inconvenience, anxiety, loss of liberty, and harm to reputation as a result of this incident.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=L0W93TYcJlIdf8osZGIOvA==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Suggs, Shameek vs City of Ny et al.","start_date":"2022-08-08","disposition_date":"2022-09-27","payout_amount":32500,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"510836/2020","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On June 26, 2017, at approximately 8:30 p.m., the defendant police officers allegedly executed a search warrant inside of plaintiff’s friend’s apartment located at 233 Sands Street, Apt. 3K, Brooklyn, New York. Upon entering the apartment, the defendant police officer asked plaintiff if he lived at the apartment and plaintiff showed the defendant officers his identification indicating he did not reside in the apartment, nevertheless defendant police unlawfully handcuffed plaintiff and arrested him.  Plaintiff was then transported against his will to the 84th precinct where he was searched, photographed, fingerprinted, and detained in a\nfilthy holding cell for many hours.  Thereafter, the defendant police officers conducted an invasive strip search of plaintiff, forcing him to take off all of his clothes and shake each piece of clothing out and then ordered to turn around, and with his back facing the defendant police officers, plaintiff was forced to bend over and spread his buttocks and lift his genitals.  he defendant police officers did not recover any drugs, contraband or other illegal paraphernalia from plaintiff. On June 27, 2017 at approximately 3:00 a.m., plaintiff was transported from the 84th Precinct to Brooklyn Central Booking and was placed in a holding cell. Defendant police officers intentionally provided the Kings County District Attorney's Office with false, misleading and incomplete information regarding their basis for\narresting and prosecuting plaintiff and falsely charged plaintiff with crimes he did not commit.  . On June 27, 2017, at approximately 8:30 p.m., after approximately 24 hours in unlawful custody, plaintiff was arraigned in Brooklyn Criminal Court and charged with Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Seventh\nDegree and released on on his own recognizance.  plaintiff was required to make approximately ten (10) additional court appearances until all charges against plaintiff were dismissed and sealed in their entirety on December 18, 2018.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=pyDwB6aXEClxFvy6RpzpPw==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Province, Jerry vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2021-07-15","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"512701/2021","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On September 17, 2016, while lawfully present inside the Regal movie theater located at 106 Court Street in Brooklyn, NY, the plaintiff was unlawfully approached, questioned, assaulted, battered, arrested, and detained by the defendants, including Delossantos, Acuria, Riker, and John Does 1-2, in an excessive manner without legal justification and solely because of his race and national origin. The defendants aggressively approached the plaintiff by holding their arms outstretched toward him in a threatening and intimidating manner and unlawfully stopped the plaintiff by grabbing his body and limbs without probable cause. The defendants then demanded that the plaintiff produce his government-issued identification. When the plaintiff questioned the reason for providing the identification, the defendants immediately struck him all over his body and head, tackled him to the ground, and physically restrained him while violently contorting his arms behind his back, finally affixing tight handcuffs. They then illegally searched the plaintiff by rifling through his clothing and pulling out his pockets, despite the clear lack of any indicia of secreted contraband or unlawful activity. Defendants who were present but not physically involved failed to intervene. Shortly after the arrest, the plaintiff was transported to the Interfaith Medical Center for medical treatment for the injuries caused by the defendants while in custody. After that, the plaintiff was wrongfully detained by the defendants over the course of several months. The defendants fabricated evidence and falsely accused the plaintiff of resisting arrest, trespassing, and other related offenses. All the charges were dismissed in favor of the plaintiff on December 15, 2017.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=8KLhixdYYjB1/7bixTtiWg==","type":"complaint"}]}],"discipline":[{"disposition_date":"2016-05-11","case_no":"2015-14536","penalty":"Vacation days (10 days)","charges":[{"desc":"Caused unauthorized Department computer inquiries to be made that were not related to official Department business.","disposition":"Guilty"},{"desc":"Sent threatening text messages to a person known to the Department.","disposition":"Guilty"}]}],"documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21020086-acuria-f12539e3d222de5ed349285374b235ae726d8ffe","type":"brady-giglio"},{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20783556-acuria209335932002-19-20","type":"brady-giglio"}],"image":"https://www.50-a.org/images/officer/E44D-julio-acuria.jpg","payroll":{"salary":"118056","regular":"117719","overtime":"15917","other":"25577","total":"159213"},"id":"E44D","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/E44D"}