{"active":true,"first_name":"Brandon","last_name":"Dildy","race":"Black","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"IAB","assignment_date":"2024-05-07","id":"IAB"},"shield_no":4602,"taxid":"952685","complaint_ids":[202301722,202103251,201409491],"command_history":[{"command":"102 PCT","id":"102pct"},{"command":"109 PCT","id":"109pct"}],"appt_date":"2012-07-11","middle_initial":"K","shield_no_history":[12294],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Ware, Travis vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2017-03-17","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"703448/2017","court":"Supreme Court - Queens","officer_name":"Dildy, Brandon K.","summary":"On August 30, 2015, at approximately 6:50pm, Plaintiff Travis Ware was lawfully present at 129-11 Jamaica Avenue in Queens, NY while helping a friend move. After Plaintiff's friend had a verbal altercation with a family member who called 911, Defendant NYPD Officer BRANDON DILDY arrived and arrested Plaintiff, his friend, and the family member who had called 911. Plaintiff was taken to the 102nd Precinct and then Queens Central Booking before being arraigned at approximately 5:00pm on August 31, 2015 at which time he was released on his own recognizance. Plaintiff returned to court several times before all charges where dismissed.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=nWvcHIIzczJnyt99ZP7V1A==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Alvarez, Jonathan vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2015-11-10","disposition_date":"2016-09-23","payout_amount":15000,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"15CV04110","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","officer_name":"Dildy, Brandon K.","summary":"Plaintiff was in the park with 7 of his friends when plain-clothed defendant officers approached them, accusing them of having weapons. Refused to identify themselves and allow plaintiff and his friends to film the incident, defendant officers assaulted the plaintiff, handcuffed him, chocked him and brought him to the 102nd precinct, which let to hospitalization. Plaintiff was assaulted again at the precinct by the defendant officers. The charges and outcome of charges were unknown.","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4920856-Alvarez-v-The-City-of-New-York-et-al","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4324577/alvarez-v-the-city-of-new-york/"},{"name":"Riley, Patricia vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2014-09-26","disposition_date":"2015-12-03","payout_amount":21500,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"14CV02678","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","officer_name":"Dildy, Brandon K.","summary":"On May 3, 2013, Plaintiff was driving her vehicle and pulled up at a stop light when POs Brandon Dildy and PO \"John Doe\" (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true name was unknown at the time the complaint was filed) approached her vehicle. PO Dildy told Plaintiff that they stopped her because her rear windows were too dark. Plaintiff gave the officers her license, registration, and insurance card. After Plaintiff had waited in her car for around half an hour, PO Dildy returned to her and asked if she had ever lived at a certain address. She responded yes. Eventually, a plainclothes officer, who would identify himself as the sergeant, arrived in a police van. He told Plaintiff that she had a warrant and when she asked for what, he replied: “In 2001, your dog peed on grass and you did not respond to a summons”. Plaintiff later found out that there never was a warrant. \n\nPlaintiff was arrested. PO “Jane Doe”, who had arrived together with Sergeant “John Doe”, handcuffed Plaintiff behind her back despite Plaintiff telling her that she had recently been in a car accident and that she had injured her right shoulder and her left wrist. The placement of the handcuffs behind Plaintiff’s back greatly exacerbated the pain she already had in her arms. Plaintiff was then taken to the precinct where she was handcuffed to a pole for more than three hours. She later appeared before a judge, who told her to go home. No warrant was mentioned in the affidavit that PO Dildy submitted to the criminal court. Instead, he claimed that he had measured Plaintiff’s rear side window with a tint meter and that the window had a light transmittance of 20%. While she was sitting in her car, Plaintiff had asked the officers if they had a tint meter. Neither one had responded. At no time had Plaintiff observed the officers use a device to measure the tint of the windows. Moreover, even if officers reasonably believed at the time of arrest that Plaintiff had violated the traffic rule at issue, they denied her equal protection by arresting her and imprisoning her in a situation where the officers had a practice of arresting and imprisoning black motorists, while non-Black motorists received tickets.","documents":[{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.355825/gov.uscourts.nyed.355825.1.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13241711/riley-v-the-city-of-new-york/"},{"name":"Anderson, Doris vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2014-09-23","disposition_date":"2018-06-19","payout_amount":30000,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"14CV05478","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","officer_name":"Dildy, Brandon K.","summary":"On June 11, 2013, Plaintiff was driving a vehicle in Queens, New York. Plaintiff was stopped by NYPD officers. Eight officers approached her vehicle. The officers claimed her vehicle’s windows were tinted too dark. The officers proceeded to beat Plaintiff, causing her to sustain personal injuries. Plaintiff was taken into custody based on the allegation that there was an open bench warrant for her arrest. Before this date, that warrant had been deemed issued in error, and Plaintiff presented evidence to the defendant officers that the warrant was false. Plaintiff was kept in custody for approximately 25 hours. Plaintiff repeatedly informed defendant officers that she was insulin dependent, but the officers did not permit her access to insulin. Plaintiff missed approximately 6 doses of insulin. Eventually the Court confirmed the warrant was in error and released Plaintiff.","documents":[{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.360870/gov.uscourts.nyed.360870.1.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4520320/anderson-v-the-city-of-new-york/"}],"discipline":[{"disposition_date":"2022-11-21","case_no":"2022-27227","penalty":"A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances","recommendation":"Command Discipline - A","allegations":[{"desc":"Violated patrol rules - failed to provide business card"}]}],"image":"https://www.50-a.org/images/officer/KWJM-brandon-dildy.jpg","payroll":{"salary":"118056","regular":"105183","overtime":"24681","other":"18475","total":"148339"},"id":"KWJM","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/KWJM"}