{"active":false,"first_name":"Timothy","last_name":"Harrington","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"CPT","command":{"command":"QNS CT","assignment_date":"2026-01-08","id":"176"},"ended_date":"2026-01-02","taxid":"917095","complaint_ids":[201501468,200802670,200310059],"command_history":[{"command":"BM SEC","id":"302"},{"command":"PER BUR","id":"456"},{"command":"NARCBMS","id":"70"},{"command":"061 PCT","id":"61pct"},{"command":"TB DT30","id":"TB30"}],"appt_date":"1996-07-18","age":50,"shield_no_history":[10566,3476,4695],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Freites, Lady, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2023-01-30","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"809131/2022E","court":"Supreme Court - Bronx","summary":"On, July 1 2018, at approximately 5:00pm inside of 2020 Grand Avenue, The Bronx NY, plaintiffs Lady Freites, Delio Guillen, Denia Guillen, Thomas Guillen, were approached by defendant officers, Orlando Colon, Wilbert Morales, Daniel Collins, Zora Strothers, Charles Awani, Jose Batista, Timothy Harrington, Adam Acosta and Stephanie Cepeda whereby they grabbed, struck and retrained plaintiffs torso, arms and wrists. Defendants illegally stopped, searched, detained and arrested plaintiffs with excessive force. Defendant officers did not posses a lawful reason to approach the plaintiffs as they were not observed to be committing any crimes or violations of the law. Defendant officers also subjected plaintiffs to illegal strip search and cavity searches. Defendants then caused criminal complaints to be against plaintiffs in criminal court, falsely accusing plaintiffs of various criminal acts. \n\nAs a result, plaintiffs were detained for multiple days and maliciously prosecuted. \n\nOn December 5, 2019, all adverse charges were unconditionally and summarily dismissed and sealed.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=BSSOE/_PLUS_4cdEs3pOApjVfsw==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Baptiste, Marlene, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2021-11-08","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"528449/2021","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On November 20, 2019, inside  1322 Sterling Place, Apt. IL, Plaintiffs Megan and Marlene were inside the apartment while Plaintiff Hoyle was elsewhere.  Defendants unlawfully entered said location and illegally searched the apartment by rushing the door, without consent or a warrant. Defendants then detained unlawfully and questioned Plaintiffs Marlene and Megan as to the whereabouts of Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle. Defendants then physically restrained both Plaintiffs with metal handcuffs forcefully in an excessively tight fashion. Defendants did not have probable cause or reasonable suspicion to detain either Plaintiff. Defendants, then subjected Plaintiff Megan to illegal interrogation tactics unless she did not comply with the Defendants and call Plaintiff Hoyle. As a result of her illegal detainment by Defendants, Plaintiff Marlene was caused to have a panic attack and was rushed to the hospital. Plaintiffs Marlene and Megan were detained for over 3 hours. \n\nPlaintiff Hoyle returned to the apartment approximately 3 hours after the defendants entered the apartment. Defendants then physically restrained Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle by handcuffing him in an excessively tight fashion. Defendants did not observe Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle commit a crime or observe him in possession of any contraband. Defendants lacked any probable cause or reasonable suspicion to arrest Plaintiff  Hoyle. Defendants then fabricated the observations to justify their illegal search and seizure of Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle, including the possession of a skimmer device and controlled substance that they falsely purported to have observed in plain view. Defendants then removed Plaintiff Hoyle to the 77th precinct by forcing him into a police vehicle. Defendants then proceeded to criminally process Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle, which included fingerprinting, retina scans, and various invasive bodily searches. Defendants then sent the fabricated evidence to Prosecutors. Defendants proceeded to suppress exculpatory evidence from prosecutors. After Plaintiff Mr. Hoyle's arraignment, he was compelled to return to court multiple times to contest egregiously false criminal charges alleged against him. Plaintiff Hoyle was released after 2 days of detention. The charges against him were dropped on January 7, 2020.","documents":[{"url":"https://web.archive.org/web/20240718190535/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=YfDMQBf92eDF1YBK8ovNXA==","type":"complaint"}]}],"documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21024053-harrington-cd9ec2ce331be50e7bbd980522e1c606fc887443","type":"brady-giglio"}],"id":"L2VZ","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/L2VZ"}