{"active":false,"first_name":"Margaret","last_name":"Ortiz","race":"White","gender":"Female","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"H INV U"},"shield_no":4662,"ended_date":"2016-07-01","taxid":"917766","complaint_ids":[201308590,9804101],"command_history":[{"command":"079 PCT","id":"79pct"}],"appt_date":"1996-07-18","lawsuits":[{"name":"Mitchell, Adrian vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2015-12-15","disposition_date":"2018-02-13","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"Zero Disposition","docket":"15CV06976","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","officer_name":"Ortiz, Margaret","summary":"Defendant officer Broadie is the father of Plaintiff's son. After Plaintiff and Officer Broadie exchanged emails regarding custody of their son, Officer Broadie went to the 79th Precinct and complained that Plaintiff threatened him, resulting in Plaintiff's arrest. Officer CHARLES provided plaintiff with a Domestic Incident Report (ìDIRî) and Plaintiff was released later that day. The DIR stated that the Internal Affairs Bureau (ìIABî) was notified about Officer Broadie's false report because he was an active member of service but IAB has given Plaintiff conflicting information about the investigation. Plaintiff was also told that the 79th Precinct Inspector had interviewed Officer BRODIE regarding the false report that he had filed.","documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4921372-Mitchell-v-City-of-New-York-et-al"},{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.378818.18.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4325030/mitchell-v-city-of-new-york/"}],"id":"NE49","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/NE49"}