{"active":true,"first_name":"Tiagom","last_name":"Reis","race":"Hispanic","gender":"Male","rank":"SGT","command":{"command":"114 PCT","assignment_date":"2026-04-06","id":"114pct"},"shield_no":4899,"taxid":"967286","complaint_ids":[202500408,202306117,202105205,202103778],"command_history":[{"command":"084 PCT","id":"84pct"}],"appt_date":"2019-01-03","middle_initial":"V","shield_no_history":[28926],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Barrett, David & Douglas, Maegan vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2024-12-19","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"","docket":"529090/2024","court":"Supreme Court - Kings","summary":"On or about July 31, 2023 Plaintiffs Barrett and Douglas were in a car with their minor children, with Plaintiff Barret in the driver's seat. As they were traveling POs Vahid Hodzic, Conor McGouran, Julio Acuria, Justin Suarez, Franddy Duran, Karl Virn Williams, Alyssa Strong, Tiagom Reis, and John and Jane Does 1-12 suddenly used their police car to block and surround Plaintiff's car. POs ordered documentation and, when provided, ordered Plaintiff Barrett out of the vehicle. Plaintiff Barrett asked why and POs purposefully shattered the driver's side window and dragged him out of the vehicle. They also pulled one of the children out of the passenger cheat. Plaintiff Barrett was thrown to the ground multiple times and tased both in and out of his car. Plaintiff Barrett did not resist and was not told what he was being arrested for. \n\nPlaintiff Barrett was wrongfully taken to the 83rd Precinct where he was subjected to an invasive bodily search while Plaintiff Douglas was released and compelled to take the children home without Plaintiff Barrett or a vehicle. POs intentionally provided false information to initiate a malicious prosecution against Plaintiff Barrett. Plaintiff Barrett was unlawfully detained for several hours before being released, and all charges were ultimately dismissed. Plaintiff Barrett experienced fear, physical injuries including to his wrists due to excessively-tight handcuffs, and emotional injuries, and both Plaintiffs suffered emotional trauma, fear, embarrassment, humiliation, emotional distress, frustration, extreme inconvenience, anxiety, loss of liberty, and harm to reputation as a result of this incident.","documents":[{"url":"https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=L0W93TYcJlIdf8osZGIOvA==","type":"complaint"}]},{"name":"Sherwood, Justin vs City of Ny, et al.","start_date":"2023-01-19","disposition_date":"2023-02-10","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"Zero Disposition","docket":"23CV00282","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","documents":[{"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.491143/gov.uscourts.nyed.491143.10.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66733913/sherwood-v-the-city-of-new-york/"},{"name":"Sherwood, Justin vs City of Ny et al.","start_date":"2022-12-16","disposition_date":"2023-09-28","payout_amount":156500,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"22CV07505","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","summary":"On August 13, 2021, the Plaintiff received a phone call from PO Reis after filing complaints regarding illegally parked vehicles near the 84th Precinct. \nOn August 26, 2021, the Plaintiff made additional complaints. Soon after, Det. Sturman called the Plaintiff, and an argument occurred between the two parties ending with Det. Sturman telling the Plaintiff \"Stop calling, dickhead!\"\nOn September 10, 2021, the Plaintiff noticed several illegally parked vehicles again, and submitted photographs/separate complaints to NYPD. PO Madera pretended to be a NYC 311 operator (the service that receives the initial complaints) and told the Plaintiff he might be banned from submitting additional complaints going forward. \nOn October 18, 2021, the Plaintiff submitted 11 more complaints to the city about illegally parked vehicles. All of these complaints were falsely claimed to have been responded to. Later, the Plaintiff received a text from an unknown number that said \"Keep f---ing around.\" The Plaintiff received 8 calls from a blocked number that continued to call, despite the Plaintiff declining each time. Throughout the course of this period, the Plaintiff endured verbal Harassment from the Defendants.","documents":[{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.489763/gov.uscourts.nyed.489763.26.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66627211/sherwood-v-the-city-of-new-york/"}],"discipline":[{"disposition_date":"2023-03-17","case_no":"2022-27396","penalty":"B - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)","recommendation":"Command Discipline - B","allegations":[{"desc":"Violated patrol rules."},{"desc":"Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department."}]}],"documents":[{"url":"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22086465-seh_967286","type":"employment-history"}],"payroll":{"salary":"109352","regular":"106546","overtime":"31388","other":"18956","total":"156890"},"news":[{"url":"https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2023/09/28/city-pays-150k-to-settle-suit-over-cops-who-harassed-man-who-reported-police-parking-misconduct","title":"City Pays $150K to Settle Suit Over Cops Who Harassed Man Who Reported Police Parking Misconduct","source":"Streetsblog","date":"2023-09-28"}],"id":"NUSK","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/NUSK"}