{"active":true,"first_name":"Sharette","last_name":"Delisser","race":"Black","gender":"Female","rank":"LT CD","command":{"command":"DB FEU","assignment_date":"2023-11-22","id":"794"},"taxid":"948137","complaint_ids":[201905283,201509183],"command_history":[{"command":"NARCBMS","id":"70"},{"command":"017 PCT","id":"17pct"},{"command":"IAB","id":"IAB"},{"command":"040 PCT","id":"40pct"},{"command":"009 PCT","id":"9pct"}],"appt_date":"2009-01-14","middle_initial":"D","shield_no_history":[1551,1018],"lawsuits":[{"name":"Harry, Rilton vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2020-09-08","disposition_date":"2022-12-15","payout_amount":0,"disposition":"Zero Disposition","docket":"20CV05951","court":"U.S. District Court - Southern District NY","officer_name":"Delisser, Sharette","summary":"On or about May 21, 2018, while plaintiff was out shopping, defendant NYPD officers Jose Fernandez (Shield #626) and John and Jane Does #1-7 arrested plaintiff without cause at or close to the corner of 1st Avenue and East 14th Street, and charged plaintiff with crimes including grand larceny in the fourth degree and possession of burglar’s tools. Plaintiff, however, did not steal any property, was not in possession of any burglar’s tools, and did not violate any law. Defendant officers tightly handcuffed the plaintiff with his hands placed behind his back causing the plaintiff to experience pain and numbness. Defendant officers refused plaintiff’s request to remove or loosen the handcuffs. Defendant officers subjected the plaintiff to an illegal search. Eventually, defendant officers forcibly placed the plaintiff inside their police vehicle and transported the plaintiff to the NYPD 9th Precinct. While at the precinct, defendant officers subjected the plaintiff to another illegal and unlawful search. Defendant officers did not recover any contraband from their unlawful searches of the plaintiff. Nonetheless, defendant officers continued to detain the plaintiff at NYPD9th Precinct. Defendant officers threatened the plaintiff with physical and/or bodily harm, causing plaintiff to fear for his life and safety. \n\nAt some point following his arrest, defendant officers met with prosecutors employed by the New York County District Attorney’s Office. During this meeting, defendant officers falsely stated to the prosecutors, among other things, that the plaintiff committed the charged crimes. Relying on the falsified police records, reports and statements, the prosecutors initiated criminal actions against the plaintiff. On or about May 22, 2018, the plaintiff was arraigned on a criminal court complaint sworn to by defendant officers falsely charging the plaintiff with petit larceny and possession of burglar’s tools. Plaintiff appeared before the criminal court on multiple occasions to defend the false charges levied against him by defendant officers. On or about February 6, 2019, the false charges levied against plaintiff were summarily dismissed. Defendant officers knew and were fully aware that the plaintiff did not commit any crime or offense, and had a realistic opportunity to intervene to prevent the harm detailed above from occurring. Nonetheless, defendants did absolutely nothing to discourage and prevent the harm detailed above from occurring and failed to protect and ensure the safety of the plaintiff.","documents":[{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.541278/gov.uscourts.nysd.541278.1.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17400038/harry-v-the-city-of-new-york/"}],"payroll":{"salary":"142202","regular":"137709","overtime":"55719","other":"19695","total":"213124"},"id":"QCQB","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/QCQB"}