{"active":false,"first_name":"Daniel","last_name":"Russell","race":"White","gender":"Male","rank":"POM","command":{"command":"BKLN CT","id":"36"},"shield_no":18296,"ended_date":"2013-03-29","taxid":"903028","complaint_ids":[9800322],"appt_date":"1993-01-19","lawsuits":[{"name":"Chapman, Derrick vs City of New York, et al.","start_date":"2013-09-05","disposition_date":"2014-02-14","payout_amount":16500,"disposition":"Settlement","docket":"13CV04748","court":"U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY","officer_name":"Russell, Daniel","summary":"On May 30, 2012, Plaintiff was on the sidewalk on Broadway, between Marion Street and Stone Avenue in Brooklyn, New York. Defendants Martin and Walsh stopped Plaintiff and asked what was in his pocket. The Defendants then proceeded to search the Plaintiff and removed everything from his pockets. One of the Defendants found half of an Oxycodone pill and Plaintiff informed them that it was a medication for which he had a prescription. Nevertheless, Defendants arrested him on a charge of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Seventh Degree. One of the Defendants handcuffed the Plaintiff and then Defendants Martin, Walsh, Dobrossy, and/or Tiernan placed him in the rear of the police van. Shortly after, the air conditioning was turned off and Defendants drove Plaintiff around for a while in stifling conditions. Defendants Dobrossy and Tiernan transported Plaintiff to the 73rd Precinct where he was imprisoned. While he was imprisoned, a friend of the Plaintiff brought his prescription bottle for Oxycodone to the Precinct and showed it to Defendants Martin, Walsh, and/or Cuozzo. Plaintiff was then transported to Brooklyn Central Booking where he continued to be imprisoned. On May 31, 2012, Defendant Russell signed a Criminal Court complaint accusing Plaintiff of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Seventh Degree. Plaintiff was arraigned and released on his own recognizance. On October 23, 2012, the criminal charge against the Plaintiff was dismissed on motion of the District Attorney because the Plaintiff had a prescription for the Oxycodone.","documents":[{"url":"https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.346382/gov.uscourts.nyed.346382.23.0.pdf","type":"complaint"}],"url":"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/13050021/chapman-v-the-city-of-new-york/"}],"id":"T34P","url":"https://www.50-a.org/officer/T34P"}