Complaint #201603149, April 2016

Incident: April 11, 2016
Received: April 13, 2016
Closed: November 2, 2016


Reason for contact: Report of other crime
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 105th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Nina Dill, Natarsha Vann
Officer: Humphrey, Ronald
Complainant: Black Male, 19
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition: Filed
Officer: Humphrey, Ronald
Complainant: Black Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Officer: Humphrey, Ronald
Complainant: Black Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Officer: Smalls, Terrance
Complainant: Black Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Smalls, Terrance
Complainant: Black Male, 19
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Humphrey, Ronald Black Male, 19 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition: Filed
Humphrey, Ronald Black Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Humphrey, Ronald Black Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Smalls, Terrance Black Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Smalls, Terrance Black Male, 19 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Humphrey, Ronald
No penalty

Smalls, Terrance
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.