Complaint #201904088, April 2019
Officer:
Diab, William
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Diab, William
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Lasaponara, Piero
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Lasaponara, Piero
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Exonerated
Officer:
Lasaponara, Piero
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Quirk, James
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Quirk, James
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Exonerated
Officer:
Quirk, James
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer:
Diab, William
Complainant:
White Male, 40-44
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer:
Quirk, James
Complainant:
White Male, 40-44
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer:
Lasaponara, Piero
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Quirk, James
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Diab, William
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Unsubstantiated
Diab, William
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Lasaponara, Piero
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Unsubstantiated
Lasaponara, Piero
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Exonerated
Lasaponara, Piero
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Quirk, James
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Unsubstantiated
Quirk, James
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Exonerated
Quirk, James
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Diab, William
White Male, 40-44
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Quirk, James
White Male, 40-44
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Lasaponara, Piero
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Unsubstantiated
Quirk, James
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Penalties
Diab, William
APU Plea Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status:
Closed: Resolved by plea, February 2024
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Command Discipline B
Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 6 days
Lasaponara, Piero
APU Plea Penalty:
Command Discipline B 5 days
APU Case Status:
Closed: Resolved by plea, July 2023
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Command Discipline A
Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Quirk, James
APU Plea Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status:
Closed: Resolved by plea, February 2024
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Command Discipline A
Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.