Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Attali v. City of New York et al
Case # 15CV00426,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Complaint
Description: A former NYPD officer is suing the NYPD for $150 million, claiming that he was routinely harassed for his Jewish heritage and barraged with anti-Semitic remarks. In a lawsuit obtained by JNS, David Attali, who holds dual citizenship in the United States and Israel, filed a 29-page lawsuit against the NYPD for discrimination and arguing that he was driven to quit the force after six years of abuse. Complaint unavailable