Sheldon O. Baker

Badge #347, Black Male
Police Officer at 101st Precinct since November 2019, active
Service started October 2018, made $65,700 last year, Tax #966455

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word

Complaints

4 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Unable to Determine
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202201424, February 2022
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202200097, January 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202105373, September 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202105125, January 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202201424, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202200097, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202105373, September 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 55-59 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Action Male, 55-59 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #202105125, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Frye, Marcus vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 720396/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, September 13, 2021

Other Documents

Employment History Summary