Sean T. Sloman

Sean T. Sloman

Sean T. Sloman
Badge #16483, White Male
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since May 2023, active
Also served at Quality Assurance
Service started July 2016, made $116,000 last year, Tax #962110

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26366
Closed: 8/17/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$425,000   Coleman, Kareem vs City of New York, et al., 2020 NYCSC NYCSC 161122/2020
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208743, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Middle Eastern/North African Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Dominican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202200158, January 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202003791, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202208743, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Other Middle Eastern/North African Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Gesture Middle Eastern/North African Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Middle Eastern/North African Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Dominican Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Force: Hit against inanimate object Dominican Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202200158, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Alleged Victim Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202003791, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26366
Closed: 8/17/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $425,000 total settlements.

Griffin, Anthony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 158006/2021, Supreme Court - New York, August 31, 2021

Coleman, Kareem vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 161122/2020, Supreme Court - New York, December 22, 2020, ended September 15, 2021
$425,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On 5/24/19, Plaintiff Kareem Coleman was in the vicinity of West 113th Street and St Nicholas Avenue, where Officers Sloman, Caleb, Hernandez, Toribio, Doe, and Roe, without cause or legal justification, stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained him in an aggressive and excessive manner. He was then falsely and maliciously prosecuted, remaining incarcerated for over 24 hours and sustaining physical and emotional pain and injuries as a result.