Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Duran C. Mclean
Also served at
Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Community Affairs Section,
68th Precinct,
71st Precinct,
70th Precinct
Service
started July 2008,
made $166,000 last year,
Tax #947244
Black Male
Lawsuit settlements:
$10,000 Peterson, Casey vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV02391
View Details
$10,000 Peterson, Casey vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV02391
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2
Exonerated
1
Unfounded
2
Unsubstantiated
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202105266,
August 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #202101639,
March 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202101508,
March 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Female |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202003841,
May 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202105266, August 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Black Female, 30-34 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202101639, March 2021 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202101508, March 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Exonerated | |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Black Female, 25-29 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) | |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202003841, May 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Chokehold | White Male, 30-34 | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-26920
Closed: 8/17/2022
Case Details:
- Wrongful search of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Lawsuits
Peterson, Casey vs City of New York, et al.Case # 14CV02391, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 21, 2014, ended August 8, 2014
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 19, 2023, Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of a subway station when officers, including Officer Duran McLean, stopped Plaintiff. The officers falsely accused Plaintiff of unlawfully passing from one subway car to another. They placed Plaintiff under arrest and transported him to the precinct. At the precinct, the officers falsely informed the DA's office that they had observed Plaintiff unlawfully pass from one subway car to the next. Plaintiff's criminal case was eventually dismissed.