Adam J. Landau

Badge #18079, White Male
Former Police Officer at 44th Precinct
Service started July 2003, ended July 2023, Tax #932879

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Word


Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202003380, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201904816, June 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003380, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201904816, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Hispanic Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26281
Opened: 8/3/2010
Closed: 7/22/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2010-2153
Opened: 8/3/2010
Closed: 1/17/2013
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to properly safeguard a prisoner.
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (12 days)


Lawsuits

Aviles, David vs City of New York
Case # 303548/2016, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 15, 2016, ended July 11, 2017
Zero Disposition

Other Documents