David K. Kim

Badge #26721, Asian Male
Police Officer at 103rd Precinct since September 2018, active
Service started October 2015, made $105,000 last year, Tax #959732

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28016
Closed: 3/6/2023
Case: 2022-27338
Closed: 1/25/2023

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202302666, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202201234, October 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202104160, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details

Complaint #202302666, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202201234, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202104160, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 80-99 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 80-99 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 80-99 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 5 days)
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28016
Closed: 3/6/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-27338
Closed: 1/25/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, b - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days), vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Bah, Alhaji, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 513861/2018, Supreme Court - Kings, August 14, 2018

Other Documents

Employment History Summary