Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2023-27966
Closed: 5/10/2023
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules.
-
Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
-
Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (6 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Case: 2022-25228
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case Details:
-
Failed to activate their body worn camera.
-
Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other
Case: 2022-25351
Closed: 2/25/2023
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully stopped a vehicle.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-26648
Closed: 2/24/2023
Case Details:
-
Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.
Knight, Tahje vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810019/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 29, 2023
Perez, Gabriel, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804083/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 14, 2023
Epps, Kevin, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025292/2020,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 5, 2020, ended March 11, 2022
$45,000 Settlement
