Howard Darsi

Howard Darsi

Howard Darsi
Badge #6624, White Male
Police Officer at 75th Precinct since March 2021, active
Service started October 2019, made $63,300 last year, Tax #968364

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29494
Closed: 1/6/2024
Case: 2023-29501
Closed: 1/5/2024
Case: 2023-29099
Closed: 11/17/2023

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202205747, August 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202204727, July 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202205003, July 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202203247, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202205747, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 40-44 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202204727, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202205003, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202203247, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29494
Closed: 1/6/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2023-29501
Closed: 1/5/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2023-29099
Closed: 11/17/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Collado, Stacey vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 714469/2022, Supreme Court - Queens, August 30, 2022