Marc A. Acevedo

Marc A. Acevedo

Marc A. Acevedo
Badge #12539, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at 121st Precinct
Service started January 2018, ended March 2024, Tax #964859

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25379
Closed: 5/21/2022
Case: 2022-25381
Closed: 5/21/2022

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202202055, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202004841, July 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Asian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Asian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Complainant: Asian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Asian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Asian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202202055, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202004841, July 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Asian Male, 21-24 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Asian Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number Asian Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Asian Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Asian Male, 21-24 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25379
Closed: 5/21/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-25381
Closed: 5/21/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Other Documents