Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2023-27882
Closed: 6/10/2023
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
-
Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Case: 2022-27144
Closed: 5/12/2023
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules.
-
Wrongfully frisked an individual.
-
Wrongfully searched an individual.
-
Wrongfully stopped an individual.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Named in 4 known lawsuits.
Jacques, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 534041/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, November 22, 2022
Dawkins, Patrick as The Png of D., J. A Minor Under The Age of 18 vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 530120/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, November 3, 2022
Soto, Luis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV04966,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 4, 2022
Complaint
Love, Maniyja vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 517921/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 4, 2022