Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Rufian S. Arshad
Badge #20210,
Asian Male
Also served at
30th Precinct
Service
started October 2016,
made $128,000 last year,
Tax #962225
Complaints
4
Complaints
8
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Exonerated
2
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202201414,
February 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202100068,
January 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202007677,
November 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #202001243,
March 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 46 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 46 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 46 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Penalty: | Instructions |
| Complaint #202201414, February 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Black Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202100068, January 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 40-44 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202007677, November 2020 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Complainant Uncooperative | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202001243, March 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 46 | Exonerated |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 46 | Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions) |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 46 | Exonerated |
| Penalty: Instructions | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2023-28592
Closed: 6/20/2023
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Lawsuits
Named in 3 known lawsuits.Nieves, Michael vs Best, Miriam R., et al.
Case # 21CV07171, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 25, 2021, ended January 6, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On March 26, 2021 plaintiff's defense counsel filed a motion to dismiss. On June 14, 2021, the ADA filed a response to the Motion to dismiss. On June 23, 2021 plaintiff's defense counsel filed a response to the response to the motion to dismiss. On July 28, 2021 Judge Best entered a decision and order denying the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff states that the judge falsified several statements about body cam footage of a fire which he was involved in.
Richardson, Dewayne vs Arshad, Rafian, et al.
Case # 20CV05068, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 8, 2020
Complaint
Nieves, Michael vs Honorable Judge Farbers, Curtis, J., et al.
Case # 20CV00990, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, May 1, 2020, ended March 31, 2023
Zero Disposition
Complaint