Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Jose D. Garcia
Badge #6683,
Hispanic Male
Also served at
42nd Precinct
Service
started July 2016,
made $125,000 last year,
Tax #961780
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Exonerated
Complaint #202004551,
June 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Closed: Charges not served |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Charges not served, August 2023 |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| APU Quarterly Report summary |
Complaint #201910052,
November 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #201909025,
October 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 31 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202004551, June 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) | Black Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, August 2023 | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| APU Quarterly Report summary | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201910052, November 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 21 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201909025, October 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Exonerated | |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Black Male, 31 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-25587
Closed: 10/18/2023
Case Details:
- Used improper force tactics.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Lawsuits
Cuevas, Christopher vs City of New York, et al.Case # 809534/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 9, 2022