Daniel B. Tilman

Daniel B. Tilman

Daniel B. Tilman
Badge #5517, Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 2 at 46th Precinct Detective Squad since September 2014, active
Also served at 19th Precinct, Patrol Borough Manhattan North AC
Service started March 2000, made $169,000 last year, Tax #926209

Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
3 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200704078, March 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200207853, November 2002
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200202566, April 2002
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200102089, March 2001
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Asian Female, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200704078, March 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 41 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200207853, November 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Black Male, 21 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200202566, April 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 31 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200102089, March 2001
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Asian Female, 34 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Dowell, Colleen vs Strong, Douglas, et al.
Case # 16CV06819, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 30, 2016, ended February 13, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On February 16, 2012, while on duty, Defendant officers were having dinner and drinking alcohol at a restaurant owned by Jose Hernandez, with whom they had "a continuing relationship." Plaintiff, a newly employed waitress, was asked by Hernandez to sit with the officers and drink with them in honor of Defendant Strong's birthday. Plaintiff did so, remaining for at least an hour. Defendants Tilman, Rosa, & Aguayo encouraged Plaintiff and Strong to drink. Hernandez & Strong then asked plaintiff to "come to the back of the restaurant", to which Tilman, Rosa, & Aguayo cheered. Plaintiff agreed, interpreting this as meaning a public table, but Hernandez & Strong in fact led her down a hallway to an unfamiliar room. ...