Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Grullon, Ashley vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 810556/2023E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 11, 2023
Scott, William vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 805335/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, April 19, 2021
Nelson, Michael vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV10066,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 12, 2016, ended November 14, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint,
Original Complaint
Description: Defendant officers entered Plaintiff's apartment and arrested him in connection with a robbery that happened 4 months earlier. Plaintiff was brought to the 46th Precinct, interviewed, and charged with Robbery in the 2nd and 3rd degrees, Petit Larceny, Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the 5th Degree, and Endangering the Welfare of a Child. All charges were later dismissed by the DA.