Angel D. Lopez

Angel D. Lopez

Angel D. Lopez
Badge #18194, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 47th Precinct since December 2015, active
Service started July 2015, made $117,000 last year, Tax #958827

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24269
Closed: 6/24/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$100,000   Wilcox, Keith, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2022 BCSC BCSC 804896/2022E
View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
19 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
9 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202206292, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202205329, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202204079, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201900271, December 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201806825, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201807557, August 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201609271, November 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201700410, October 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202206292, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202205329, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202204079, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201900271, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 33 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 33 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 33 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 33 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 33 Exonerated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201806825, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 33 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201807557, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 33 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Female, 34 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Female, 34 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Female, 34 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201609271, November 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 47 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201700410, October 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 26 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24269
Closed: 6/24/2022
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Living outside of state or permissible counties.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $100,000 total settlements.

Wilcox, Keith, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804896/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 30, 2022, ended November 10, 2022
$100,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 17, 2021, Officers Lopez, Santomero, and unknown officers Doe and Roe approached, stopped, searched, assaulted, and detained Plaintiff Keith Wilcox with no legal justification. They subjected Mr. Wilcox to a strip search, arraigned him, and falsely and malicious subjected him to prosecution despite that he had committed no crime. He was incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated favorably.

Hazel, Darren vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 033242/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 18, 2019

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/18/2023