Nicholas E. Santomero

Nicholas E. Santomero

Nicholas E. Santomero
Badge #16608, White Male
Police Officer at 44th Precinct Detective Squad since February 2023, active
Also served at 47th Precinct
Service started January 2014, made $124,000 last year, Tax #956238

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28765
Closed: 11/29/2023
Case: 2022-25289
Closed: 12/2/2022

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$100,000   Wilcox, Keith, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2022 BCSC BCSC 804896/2022E
$30,000   Glass, Nahmir vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 032913/2020E
$150,000   Henry, Kevan, et al. vs City of New York, 2020 BCSC BCSC 031048/2020E
$20,000   Crawford, Daijon vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 023769/2019E
$150,000   Chevannes, Raymond vs City of New York, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 028696/2018E
$20,000   Diaz, Michael Jr. vs City of New York, et al., 2016 SDNY SDNY 16CV09648
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
17 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
4 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202203763, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202002863, April 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, July 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202001605, February 2020
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201904055, March 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201706006, July 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201703887, May 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 46
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202203763, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202002863, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 21-24 Exonerated
Force: Gun Pointed Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, July 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #202001605, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Hispanic Male, 23 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Hispanic Male, 23 Closed - Pending Litigation
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 23 Closed - Pending Litigation
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201904055, March 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 26 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201706006, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 31 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 31 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 31 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201703887, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 46 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28765
Closed: 11/29/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-25289
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case Details:
  1. 01..wrongfully unholstered/displayed a firearm.
  2. Wrongful threat of force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications


Lawsuits

Named in 9 known lawsuits, $470,000 total settlements.

Wilcox, Keith, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804896/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 30, 2022, ended November 10, 2022
$100,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 17, 2021, Officers Lopez, Santomero, and unknown officers Doe and Roe approached, stopped, searched, assaulted, and detained Plaintiff Keith Wilcox with no legal justification. They subjected Mr. Wilcox to a strip search, arraigned him, and falsely and malicious subjected him to prosecution despite that he had committed no crime. He was incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated favorably.

Daniels, Quatrell vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802673/2021, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 26, 2021

Glass, Nahmir vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 032913/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 3, 2020, ended March 29, 2022
$30,000 Settlement

Henry, Kevan, et al. vs City of New York
Case # 031048/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 30, 2020, ended April 18, 2022
$150,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 19, 2019, Plaintiff was lawfully on the street when approached by P.O.s including Officer Kelvin Guillen and Officer Nicholas Santomero. With no arrest warrant or probable cause, P.O.s stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained Plaintiff. Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and was incarcerated for over 24 hours. During the arrest and detainment, Plaintiff sustained injuries as a result of assault and battery by P.O.s to his head, neck, back, body and limbs. All charges against Plaintiff were eventually terminated.

Crawford, Daijon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023769/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 14, 2019, ended October 26, 2020
$20,000 Settlement

Chevannes, Raymond vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 029594/2017, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 14, 2018

Chevannes, Raymond vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 028696/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 14, 2018, ended September 23, 2019
$150,000 Settlement

Sander, Patrick vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 028978/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 22, 2018

Diaz, Michael Jr. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV09648, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 15, 2016, ended July 11, 2017
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: The plaintiff was home when the defendant officers entered and arrested the plaintiff's brother. While they handcuffed the plaintiff's brother, the plaintiff asked if he could be of assistance and informed the officers that the plaintiff was in fact an Auxiliary Police Officer. After the plaintiff's brother was put in the police car, the defendant officers took the plaintiff's badge and told him to report to the 47th Precinct where he was charged with Obstructing Governmental Administration. The DA declined to prosecute.

Other Documents