Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word
Offensive Language: Gender
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word
Offensive Language: Gender
Tatiana Moncada
Badge #25614,
Hispanic Female
Service
started July 2011,
made $115,000 last year,
Tax #950729
Other names:
Tatiana Latorre
Lawsuit settlements:
$40,000 Zied, Ritishea vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 033175/2019E
View Details
$40,000 Zied, Ritishea vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 033175/2019E
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
14
Allegations
5
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Unfounded
6
Unsubstantiated
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202204935,
June 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #201911107,
December 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Age 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Age 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Age 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-SOL |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #201904964,
June 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | White Male, 19 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201501953,
March 2015
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Guilty |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 2 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2018 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 2 days |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint Interview Details |
| Complaint #202204935, June 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201911107, December 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Female | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Force: Physical force | Age 15-17 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Discourtesy: Word | Age 15-17 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Age 15-17 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Female | Unsubstantiated |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-SOL | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201904964, June 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Hispanic Female, 20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Hispanic Female, 20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Hispanic Female, 20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Hispanic Female, 20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Male, 19 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Hispanic Female, 20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201501953, March 2015 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Hispanic Male, 18 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 2 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2018 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 2 days | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| Complaint Interview Details | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-27011
Closed: 3/12/2023
Case Details:
- Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
- Wrongfully used physical force.
- Wrongfully used offensive language.
Recommendation: Training
Case Details:
- Guilty: While on-duty, stopped a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
Penalty: Vacation days (2 days)
Case Details:
- Guilty: While on-duty, during an official Department interview regarding an investigation, did wrongfully make misleading statements.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)
Lawsuits
Zied, Ritishea vs City of New York, et al.Case # 033175/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 7, 2019, ended March 14, 2022
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 13, 2019 at 1:30 AM, Plaintiff Ritishea Zied was near Marion Avenue and East 187th Street, Bronx, when Defendants Officer Robert Wichers, Officer John Doe, Officer John Roe, Sergeant Bryan Ortiz, Officer Jonathan Gonzalez, Officer Yvonne Rosario, Officer Yaowen Liu, Officer Michael O'Connor, Officer Edin Bacovic, Officer Chad Kirk and Officer Tatiana Latorre summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, handcuffed, assaulted, battered, and detained him using excessive force. Plaintiff was taken to an unidentified precinct and to the Bronx Criminal Courthouse. While in Defendant Officer's custody, Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and assault of her head, neck, back, body, and limbs. Plaintiff was incar...
Other Documents
NYPD Trial Decision 3/22/2019