Tameika Goode

Tameika Goode

Tameika Goode
Lieutenant at 32nd Precinct since July 2022, active
Also served at 100th Precinct, 49th Precinct
Service started July 2004, made $154,000 last year, Tax #934950
Black Female

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14511
Closed: 1/21/2016

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$105,000   Francois, Oscar vs City of New York, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 027324/2018E
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
2 Complainant Unavailable
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202200212, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201906845, August 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201702740, April 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, July 2021
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201100024, December 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200808055, June 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 13
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 13
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202200212, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 45-49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201906845, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201702740, April 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 24 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, July 2021
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201100024, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 41 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200808055, June 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 16 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 13 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 13 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14511
Closed: 1/21/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While conducting the second platoon roll call, made offensive comments to subordinates
  2. Guilty: While conducting the second platoon roll call, made negative comments to another member of the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Francois, Oscar vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 027324/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 27, 2018, ended December 22, 2020
$105,000 Settlement

Other Documents