Gerard E. Walker

Gerard E. Walker

Gerard E. Walker
Badge #5170, Black Male
Former Sergeant at 49th Precinct
Also served at 34th Precinct
Service started June 2003, ended December 2021, Tax #931185

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17234
Closed: 3/31/2017

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Exonerated
1 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202103711, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details

Complaint #201700616, January 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201310450, November 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, October 2017
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201309958, October 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200403167, April 2004
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Female, 54
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202103711, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint White Male, 60-64 Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
additional details
Complaint #201700616, January 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Female, 18 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201310450, November 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 26 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, October 2017
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201309958, October 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 41 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200403167, April 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Female, 54 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17234
Closed: 3/31/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty and after being notified to respond to an incident involving an off-duty Member of Service, failed to respond to said incident.
  2. Guilty: Failed and neglected to make proper activity log entries as required.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty made misleading or otherwise inaccurate statements when asked if he had responded to a specific assignment.
  4. Guilty: While on-duty made misleading or otherwise inaccurate statements when asked if he responded to a specific assignment.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)