Elizabeth J. Judd
Badge #16653,
White Female
Also served at
Warrant Section
Service
started July 2005,
made $123,000 last year,
Tax #938740
Complaints
4
Complaints
5
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complaint Withdrawn
2
Exonerated
1
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202103597,
June 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #200904104,
March 2009
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 35 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #200715368,
September 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #200707966,
April 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 50 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Complaint #202103597, June 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | White Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200904104, March 2009 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | White Female, 35 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS | Exonerated | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200715368, September 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 24 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200707966, April 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 50 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongfully associated with an individual known to the Department who engaged in criminal activities.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)