Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Claudia A. Pinzon
Badge #14353,
Hispanic Female
Service
started July 2018,
made $61,700 last year,
Tax #966278
Complaints
3
Complaints
3
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Unsubstantiated
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202206365,
September 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202101782,
February 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201907897,
September 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 66 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Guilty |
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Guilty after trial, December 2023 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| Documents: | NYPD Trial Decision |
| APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint #202206365, September 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202101782, February 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Black Male, 50-54 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201907897, September 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Black Female, 66 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty | ||
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, December 2023 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| Documents: | NYPD Trial Decision | |
| APU Quarterly Report summary | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Discipline
Case: 2020-22065
Closed: 5/15/2020
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongful entry of a premises.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)
Lawsuits
Lara, Tricia vs City of New York, et al.Case # 22CV07542, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 15, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 30, 2022, the Plaintiff was at her home in Brooklyn. A family member with a history of violence, Ansila E. Bryant, came to her home, attempted to enter her home, and forcibly pushed the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff punched Bryant in response and went to the precinct to report the incident. At the precinct, the Plaintiff met with an NYPD officer who refused to file a report. The NYPD officer contacted someone via department radio and told the Plaintiff to stay at the precinct. The Plaintiff told the NYPD officer that she had surveillance camera footage of the incident. While the Plaintiff was at the precinct, Defendant NYPD officers Richard Powers and Robert Emmanuel responded to Bryant's 911 call. Powers a...