Joseph C. Digiacomo

Badge #1827, White Male
Detective Grade 2 at Special Investigations Unit since November 2021, active
Service started July 2011, made $158,000 last year, Tax #950325

Complaints

1 Complaint
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201600521, January 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201600521, January 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 27 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 27 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 27 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Female, 25 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 27 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

An v. City of New York et al
Case # 16CV05381, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: The plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk when he saw 3 officers questioning a man on the ground. He decided to film the encounter and was approached by Officer Bejac who told the plaintiff that he was in the way of pedestrian traffic and to back up. The plaintiff complied, but continued filming and refused to present identification. The officers arrested the plaintiff for obstructing governmental administration, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. A jury trial occurred July 7-9, 2015, before Justice Gilbert Hong. The jury returned a not-guilty verdict on all counts.