Giancarlo A. Proietti

Giancarlo A. Proietti

Giancarlo A. Proietti
Badge #23706, White Male
Police Officer at 63rd Precinct since February 2018, active
Service started January 2017, made $127,000 last year, Tax #963218

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25275
Closed: 10/10/2023
Case: 2023-28705
Closed: 9/1/2023

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
12 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202311824, December 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202205377, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202001985, February 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201905781, June 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202311824, December 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202205377, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202001985, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 50-54 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 50-54 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201905781, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 32 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 32 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25275
Closed: 10/10/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to obtain medical treatment.
  2. Wrongfully used physical force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2023-28705
Closed: 9/1/2023
Case Details:
  1. 01....
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Rowley, Anthony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 528769/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, November 23, 2021

Ottley, Basel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV02861, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 19, 2020, ended September 29, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On February 17, 2019, Basel Ottley was driving with Christian Heckstall to meet Brittnay Taylor for breakfast. While waiting at a traffic light on Ralph Avenue and Flatlands Avenue, Ottley dozed off. Heckstall was in the backseat. Heckstall told Ottley that an unknown P.O. broke through the driver’s side window where Ottley was sitting. As a result of the window break, Ottley was injured by the blunt object used to break the glass and the glass itself. Ottley was then violently pulled from the vehicle and assaulted Ottley while he was on the ground and not resisting. Other P.O.s joined in the assault and Ottley lost consciousness and woke up in the hospital before being taken to a detention complex. Ottley had ...

Other Documents