Jesse T. Hard

Badge #23523, White Male
Police Officer at 67th Precinct since October 2020, active
Service started January 2019, made $111,000 last year, Tax #967102

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25749
Closed: 2/26/2023

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202204638, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202104681, July 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202008044, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202003068, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201909671, October 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202204638, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202104681, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202008044, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202003068, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201909671, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25749
Closed: 2/26/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Gravesande, Cheryl vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 522373/2022, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 11, 2022

Other Documents