Ahmad Brannon

Ahmad Brannon

Ahmad Brannon
Badge #8620, Black Male, 45
Police Officer at Queens Court Section since January 2024, active
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail, 62nd Precinct, 69th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $125,000 last year, Tax #936238

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22368
Closed: 7/28/2022
Case: 85942/09
Closed: 10/17/2011

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201908631, September 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #201300354, January 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201111510, August 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200717096, November 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201908631, September 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 45 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Female, 45 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 45 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 45 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Female, 45 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography Black Female, 45 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #201300354, January 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201111510, August 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 21 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200717096, November 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 50 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22368
Closed: 7/28/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully took pictures.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case: 85942/09
Opened: 11/27/2009
Closed: 10/17/2011
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Purposely interrupted a radio transmission
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty (30) vacation days.


Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 10/17/2011