Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2023-27826
Closed: 4/7/2023
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, a - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2011-4653
Opened: 4/26/2011
Closed: 3/29/2012
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while said member's ability was impaired
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully refused to submit to a breathalyzer test
-
Guilty:
Unfit for duty
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgement is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty-four (34) pre-trial suspension days, fifteen (15) vacation days, ordered breath testing.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $42,500 total settlements.
Campbell, Eric, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157214/2018,
Supreme Court - New York, August 6, 2018
Jackson, Jayrom vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 154154/2017,
Supreme Court - New York, May 8, 2017, ended June 27, 2019
$15,000 Settlement
Anthony, Arion, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06364,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 12, 2015, ended February 13, 2017
$27,500 Settlement
Complaint,
Second Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers pulled over Plaintiff's car allegedly for a broken tail light. Officers first searched the trunk, then approached the Plaintiffs, made them get out of the car and searched the inside of the car. One Plaintiff was charged with Criminal pos. of a weapon for a pocket knife, dis con, and traffic violation 3752A. Charges were dismissed and CCRB was involved.
