William H. Sitzman

William H. Sitzman

William H. Sitzman
Badge #402, White Male, 40
Sergeant at Training Bureau since April 2021, active
Also served at 9th Precinct, 81st Precinct
Service started July 2005, made $159,000 last year, Tax #939474

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2014-12261
Closed: 8/29/2014

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$17,500   Davis, Kent vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV01699
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
7 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201410457, October 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201306080, July 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, May 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
additional details

Complaint #201303156, February 2013
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201102466, February 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200807546, May 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 11
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 11
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201410457, October 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 19 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201306080, July 2013
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, May 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
additional details
Complaint #201303156, February 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 30 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force Male, 30 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201102466, February 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 16 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200807546, May 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 11 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 11 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-12261
Closed: 8/29/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Searched a residence without sufficient legal authority.
Penalty: Vacation days (3 days)


Lawsuits

Davis, Kent vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV01699, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 20, 2014, ended June 24, 2014
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint, Stipulation
Description: On September 23, 2013, Kent Davis was unlawfully detained, searched, arrested, and prosecuted on the false charge of attempted tampering with physical evidence. Mr. Davis regularly played chess in Fulton Park and had recently completed a game of chess when the defendants entered the park. After one of the officers falsely claimed Mr. Davis had marijuana, he was detained, questioned, searched and arrested, on the false claim that he had destroyed marijuana. At the 81st Precinct Stationhouse, defendant Hirsch, prepared or allowed to be prepared false police reports accusing Mr. Davis of attempted tampering with evidence. While at the Stationhouse, one or more of the defendants caused Mr. Davis to be strip-searche...

Other Documents