Oscar H. Nunez

Badge #3505, Hispanic Male, 42
Sergeant Special Assignment at Manhattan Court Section since September 2022, active
Also served at 73rd Precinct
Service started July 2004, made $213,000 last year, Tax #935412

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Stop (3)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2020-22461
Closed: 10/6/2020

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000   Dubois, Earl vs City of New York, et al., 2019 KCSC KCSC 504279/2019
$25,000   Registe, Tarik vs City of New York, et al., 2019 KCSC KCSC 501785/2019
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
12 Allegations
4 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201708880, October 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201704898, May 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201604051, May 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201510906, December 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201708880, October 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 23 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201704898, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 15 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201604051, May 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 23 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 23 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 31 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 23 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 23 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 23 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201510906, December 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 33 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2020-22461
Closed: 10/6/2020
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Involved in a physical altercation.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Unfit for duty.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while their ability was impaired.
  4. Pleaded Guilty: Endangered the welfare of a child.
  5. Pleaded Guilty: Criminal mischief (attempted)
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (35 days), suspended w/o pay (25 days), vacation days (25 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $55,000 total settlements.

Dubois, Earl vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 504279/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, May 14, 2019, ended December 13, 2021
$30,000 Settlement

Registe, Tarik vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 501785/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, April 2, 2019, ended October 10, 2019
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 27, 2017, at approximately 6:30 p.m., Tarik Registe was lawfully driving his motor vehicle in the vicinity of 420 Blake Avenue, Brooklyn, New York when the defendant police officers, including Officers Jessica Brito and Joseph Mcevoy, and Oscar Nunez, unlawfully stopped the vehicle and unlawfully handcuffed and falsely arrested plaintiff without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Registe had not violated any traffic laws. They ordered him to get out of his vehicle and searched it without his permission, finding no illegal contraband. He was handcuffed, arrested, and transported to the 73rd Precinct. The officers told provided the DA's office with false and misleading evidence that Registe violat...

Gill, Kevin, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV05513, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 30, 2015, ended March 23, 2017
Zero Disposition
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers forcefully entered Plaintiff's home and searched it. Plaintiff called the 73rd Precinct to make a formal complaint but Defendant Officers Mizra and Anton refused to accept it. On another occasion, Defendant Officers stopped Plaintiff, asked him for ID, searched him, and then let him go. On a third occasion, Plaintiff was stopped ad arrested by Defendant Officers, brought to the 73rd Precinct under an alleged warrant. Any charges and outcomes are not specified.

Other Documents