Keith E. Drummond

Keith E. Drummond

Keith E. Drummond
Badge #14115, White Male
Police Officer at 84th Precinct since April 2021, active
Also served at 75th Precinct
Service started January 2006, made $113,000 last year, Tax #940106

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name


Complaints

7 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202002424, March 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #201705517, June 2017
Allegation: Offensive Language: Disability
Complainant: Black Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201201352, January 2012
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201201180, January 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201100576, August 2010
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201007293, May 2010
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200906118, April 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202002424, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Female, 25-29 Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #201705517, June 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Disability Black Male, 41 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201201352, January 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201201180, January 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 32 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201100576, August 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 15 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201007293, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 48 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 48 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 48 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200906118, April 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-24965
Closed: 6/20/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-24964
Closed: 4/28/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - refused to provide name.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2016-15008
Closed: 1/6/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to appear in traffic court.
Penalty: Vacation days (7 days)


Other Documents