Philip J. Fioranelli

Philip J. Fioranelli

Philip J. Fioranelli
Badge #13928, White Male, 48
Police Officer at Brooklyn Court Section since June 2023, active
Also served at 75th Precinct, 81st Precinct
Service started July 2004, made $166,000 last year, Tax #934865

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 86603/10
Closed: 3/26/2012
Case: 2010-2274
Closed: 8/13/2010

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202311677, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #200905042, March 2009
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200818219, December 2008
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200805386, April 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200613222, October 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202311677, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #200905042, March 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Female, 27 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Female Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200818219, December 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 42 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 42 Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 42 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200805386, April 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200613222, October 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Female, 21 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 86603/10
Opened: 7/6/2010
Closed: 3/26/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully engaged in a physical and verbal altercation with another Member of Service
  2. Guilty: Having become aware of an allegation of serious misconduct, failed to notify the Internal Affairs Bureau
  3. Guilty: Wrongfully in possession of a counterfeit Department shield
  4. Guilty: Made misleading statements during an official Department interview
Penalty: Forfeiture of forty- five (45) vacation days

Case: 2010-2274
Closed: 8/13/2010
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: While on-duty, officer was involved in an on-duty verbal and physical altercation with another member of the service.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to make proper notifications.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: While on-duty, was wrongfully in possession of a bogus or counterfeit New York City Police Department shield, without permission or authority to do so.
  4. Guilty: While off-duty, impeded a Department investigation.
Penalty: Vacation days (45 days)


Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional lawsuits 10CV294, 10CV1092
NYPD Trial Decision 12/26/2013