Jeanette A. Rodriguez

Jeanette A. Rodriguez

Jeanette A. Rodriguez
Badge #3555, Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 75th Precinct since February 2017, active
Service started January 2016, made $133,000 last year, Tax #961193

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Question
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26370
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case: 2022-26371
Closed: 2/27/2023
Case: 2022-25189
Closed: 2/23/2023
Case: 2022-27081
Closed: 1/23/2023

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$54,001   Nixon, Shameik vs City of New York, 2022 EDNY EDNY 21CV05900
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
17 Allegations
8 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Complainant Unavailable
3 Complainant Uncooperative
4 Exonerated

Complaint #202207485, November 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202103831, June 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 1 day)
Documents: NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202007357, October 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202007373, October 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202003958, June 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201908338, September 2019
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202207485, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202103831, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 18-20 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 18-20 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 1 day)
Documents: NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #202007357, October 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202007373, October 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 34 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202003958, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201908338, September 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 22 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26370
Closed: 5/3/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-26371
Closed: 2/27/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
  2. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-25189
Closed: 2/23/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-27081
Closed: 1/23/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual.
  3. Wrongfully questioned an individual.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $54,001 total settlements.

Williams, Qwali vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 533153/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, November 13, 2023

Nixon, Shameik vs City of New York
Case # 21CV05900, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 20, 2022, ended April 27, 2023
$54,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 5, 2020, the plaintiff was at a memorial service when NYPD Officers ordered plaintiff to go home in accordance to the emergency curfew. Plaintiff was complying with the order, but NYPD officers who were carrying batons and wearing riot gear attacked him while he was walking home. They hit him with a barricade and piled on top of him, including forcefully placing knees on his back. The officers handcuffed him too tightly, put him in the police van and continued to lift his arms causing him pain, and brought him to the precinct, falsely arresting him. Officers unnecessarily removed his socks and shoes and left him handcuffed in a cell for several hours before removing the cuffs. Plaintiff was detained for...

Williams, Kureem vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 510702/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, April 19, 2022

Rivas, John vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV06644, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 1, 2021, ended April 28, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On February 15, 2019, Plaintiff was lawfully in his apartment when police officers entered his apartment without a search warrant or consent and proceeded to falsely arrest Plaintiff and assaulted him during the arrest. This assault resulted in Plaintiff sustaining cuts and bruises to his face and body which required treatment at a hospital upon his release from custody a few days later, which resulted in a laceration to his head. Plaintiff was processed and taken to Central Booking but was released from Central Booking without any criminal charges being brought against him, as the district attorney’s office declined to prosecute Plaintiff. Note: Plaintiff uses words such as "assault" and "excessive force", b...

Other Documents