Matthew C. Salzman

Matthew C. Salzman

Matthew C. Salzman
Badge #4870, White Male
Sergeant at 69th Precinct since October 2023, active
Also served at 75th Precinct
Service started July 2015, made $151,000 last year, Tax #959190

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word
Offensive Language: Gender

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26373
Closed: 2/27/2023

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complaint Withdrawn
2 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202311341, November 2023
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202003958, June 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, August 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #201808163, September 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201807988, September 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202311341, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Race Female, 30-34 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202003958, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Offensive Language: Gender Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, August 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details
Complaint #201808163, September 2018
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201807988, September 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 22 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26373
Closed: 2/27/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
  2. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Davis, Daquan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 529311/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, October 11, 2023

Watson, Sheawn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 504872/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, February 14, 2023