Felix Rosa

Felix Rosa

Felix Rosa
Badge #14543, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 76th Precinct since May 2014, active
Service started July 2012, made $129,000 last year, Tax #953339

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-27944
Closed: 4/10/2023

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202106071, October 2021
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #201900253, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201709562, November 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201603902, April 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202106071, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #201900253, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 42 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 42 Unfounded
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201709562, November 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 33 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 33 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201603902, April 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 28 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-27944
Closed: 4/10/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Corbett, Tyshawn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 520995/2016, Supreme Court - Kings, December 15, 2016, ended July 14, 2017
Zero Disposition

Corbett, Tyshawn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV07359, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 8, 2016, ended October 11, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers pulled over Plaintiff's car and when plaintiff ran away Sergeant Muggeo shot his weapon at him and other officers maced and assaulted him. On a second occasion, officers approached Plaintiff on the street, searched him, took him to the 75th precinct because of a warrant, and strip-searched him. Plaintiff was given a summons which was later dismissed. On a third incident, Officer Morabito arrested Plaintiff for violating an Order of Protection even though it had been modified to allow his activity. Plaintiff was charged with Criminal Contempt which was later dismissed.

Other Documents