Adeel S. Rana

Adeel S. Rana

Adeel S. Rana
Deputy Inspector at 84th Precinct since July 2020
Also served in: 61st Precinct
Service started July 2004, made $205,000 last year, active
Asian Male

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17722
Closed: 6/29/2018

View Details

Complaints

7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
4 Complaints
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

January 2021 Complaint
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

June 2020 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

August 2005 Complaint
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

April 2005 Complaint
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: White Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

January 2021 Complaint
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Exonerated
additional details
June 2020 Complaint
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
August 2005 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
April 2005 Complaint
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 18 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force White Female, 18 Unfounded
Force: Hit against inanimate object White Female, 18 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17722
Closed: 6/29/2018
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Said Lieutenant, was wrongfully absent from or late to his assignment on approximately twenty-two (22) occasions
  2. Guilty: Said Lieutenant, while on duty, on approximately forty-three (43) occasions, wrongfully made or caused to be made inaccurate entries in a command log and/or in his activity log
  3. Guilty: Said Lieutenant, wrongfully made inaccurate entries in Department records in that said Lieutenant improperly submitted overtime slips that inaccurately stated he had worked his entire scheduled tour
  4. Guilty: Said Lieutenant, on numerous occasions, failed to supervise his subordinates.
  5. Guilty: Said Lieutenant, operated his personal or Department vehicle in an improper fashion, including driving at an excessive speed, disobeying traffic signals, driving his vehicle against the flow of traffic, and operating the lights and siren of an unmarked Department vehicle without police necessity
Penalty: Deduction of pensionable time, forfeiture of time/leave balances, restitution ($517), vacation days (60 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Sherwood, Justin vs City of New York et al.
Case # 22CV07505, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 16, 2022

Cochran, Deval, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 522757/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, November 19, 2020